Democrats vs Republicans

The essay below is not an exact transcript of the video, text has been added or edited, and the video does not cover the entire essay, exactly, but it comes very close. Enjoy!

I would like to explain the fundamental difference between the two most prevailing political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, also referred to as the liberals and the conservatives. Because, believe it or not, most people actually don’t know the difference. If you were to approach most people on the street and ask them why they’re a Republican or why they’re a Democrat, their best answers would likely be quite vague and broad. If you asked them why they were voting for a particular Republican or Democratic candidate, they would likely mention things like I think he or she is a good speaker or trust worthy. They may even be able to regurgitate a few party catch phrases, sound bites, or slogans, but they will usually not provide any specific reasons in terms of the issues or party ideology, simply because they don’t know them. Studies have shown that most people vote the way they do primarily because its how a family member or friend of theirs is voting. Studies have also shown that people often cast their vote towards a candidate who they think is going to win, regardless of their political philosophy.

Here is the core difference between Democrats and Republicans, which is actually quite easy to remember. Republicans crave more economic freedom but fight for social and moral regulation, whereas Democrats desire more social freedom, yet fight for economic regulation. You can see that these two parties, or rather political forces, have a Yin-Yang type relationship. This two-party system, regardless of what each may actually be called, is always inevitable to form within any democratic political system and can never be truly lost. These two parties help to provide many of the checks and balances our government needs.

One of the biggest debates between the two parties is how big should the central government be. How strong of a role should government have in our lives? This question has been struggled with as far back as the Founding Fathers and well beyond. The problem is, both parties are in part correct and both are in part incorrect. We need more government in certain areas and less government in other areas. It’s a delicate balancing act.

I should also point out that being a Democrat or a Republican is not as black and white as many may think. There is a whole spectrum of variations between the two—a gradation that extends from one extreme to the other, from the far left pole to the far right. For example, far right-winged Republicans believe in an extremely free market society, but moderate Republicans do not. Far left-winged Democrats believe in a very free socially expressive society, but moderate Democrats do not. Most rational thinking people fall somewhere in between, believing some economic and social restrictions are necessary, and that some social and economic freedoms should be allowed.

Some of you may be familiar with the Nolan Chart, which diagrams and illustrates the two main scales of freedom; one being the economic scale and the second being the social scale. When combined, you get a chart with four main quadrants, usually viewed in a diamond configuration. The left quadrant indicates liberal or Democratic views, the right indicates conservative or Republican views. If you believe in a lot of economic and social freedom, then you are a libertarian, indicated in the upper quadrant. Thankfully, pure libertarians are becoming extinct, because we’ve all basically learned that we humans need some rules and restrictions to actually better our lives. If you believe in a lot of government control, in all areas, whether economic or social, then you are a statist or an authoritarian like Hitler or Stalin, indicated down below. Everyone, based on their beliefs, falls somewhere on this chart. This may be upsetting to those of you who hate to be labeled, but try not to let it get to you, because it’s simply meant to show where you may stand on the issues. I am personally somewhere in between, making me a moderate or centrist, but I do lean much more strongly towards the Democratic philosophy and I do believe in some government regulation as long as it’s in the right areas and as long as it’s not overdone.

Nolan Chart, created by Guyus Seralius, © 2012. All Rights Reserved. Adobe Illustrator.

Since Republicans prefer more economic freedom, then it goes without saying they also support capitalism and the free market system. Democrats on the other hand tend to support socialism or at least socialized services and programs like public schools, public fire departments, public libraries, public broadcasting, and Social Security and Medicare.

Unfortunately, most Republicans seem to think that capitalism, competition, and free markets solve all problems and have an “every man for himself” type philosophy, whereas Democrats tend to think government spending solves all problems, but thankfully, hold an “all for one and one for all,” type philosophy. Republicans celebrate financial independence, self-reliance, and individuality whereas Democrats more often celebrate interdependence, cooperation, and community.

Republicans also frown on the idea of the government raising taxes on big businesses and on high income citizens, while providing a tax relief for smaller businesses and lower income citizens, especially when a percentage of that revenue goes towards helping the sick, the needy, and the poor. Republicans call this “redistributing the wealth,” and view it as a great injustice. Apparently most Republicans feel that every dollar is truly and justly earned, as well as every empty pocket. They also claim that taxing the rich to give to the poor slows down the economy by causing large business owners, who they believe are the main job creators, to stop hiring and eventually to start downsizing and laying off workers. But history has repeatedly demonstrated, time and time again, that government spending towards the middle class and the poor helps everyone, including the rich, by strengthening our economy. Most respected, well educated economists will correctly tell you that this type of government taxing and spending is the best way to boost the economy during a recession and historical statistics confirms it. I think its good that the Republican party helps to prevent the government from over taxing and over spending, but there are times when the distribution of wealth becomes suspiciously offset, indicating economic injustice or corruption, and it becomes necessary and justified to redistribute the wealth. Let’s face it, the upper class does stand on the backs of the middle class, who ironically work the hardest, yet get paid the least. And believe me, the wealthy class have found many sneaky, covert, and in many cases, unethical ways to unjustly redistribute the wealth of America. Too often the dice are loaded and the tables are rigged. So, since the relatively free market system is nowhere near perfect and never will be, “we the people” must use government to help justly redistribute the wealth. Keep in mind, if the foundation of the middle class falls, so will the upper class, and they will have the longest fall to endure.

Republicans usually advocate Trickle Down economics, believing the better off the wealthy class is the better off everyone else will be, since they believe the wealthy are the main spenders and job creators. The idea is that wealth will “trickle down” to the lower classes. But that philosophy has already proven many times in the past not to work. Wealth almost never trickles down, and instead, almost always trickles up. Large corporations and wealthy CEOs have been shown historically to sit on their money out of fear and/or greed, especially during a recession, and kink the circulation of money, which harms our economy. Statistics have shown that small business owners collectively invest more than large business owners because they do not have the luxury not to. They also usually keep a more responsible watchful eye on their business in order for it to survive and thrive, and they are known for taking better personal care of their customers. The large business owners don’t have the same incentives or desperation to do so. Also, large businesses eventually reach a maximum thresh-hold and can’t grow and so they end up seeking cheaper labor and sending American jobs overseas in order to remain competitive. It turns out that the better off the middle class is the better off everyone else is, at least up until the point of reducing the excessive power, control, and wealth of the super rich. So if the government raises taxes on the wealthy class and on larger business owners, while at the same time, providing a tax relief for the middle class and smaller business owners, then the middle class, which is the main backbone of our economy, will be in a position to spend more, expand their own businesses, and hire the workers that the big corporations can no longer afford to hire. Overall, the economy will prosper and be better off.

There also seems to be a cultural dichotomy when evaluating these two main political parties. Republicans tend to share a common personality profile with each other and so do Democrats. For instance, Republicans are usually Christian whereas Democrats, if not Christian, often study Buddhism or some form of new-age spirituality. The irony here is that the Democratic way should actually appeal to all Christians, because that party believes in sharing the burden to help all citizens as though we are all one family. Jesus could be described as a Democrat. He believed in helping the poor, healing the sick and giving aid to the elderly at his expense and respected those who did the same. Many Republicans have explained that they are not against giving to those in need, but have argued that it’s more noble to give voluntarily instead of everyone being forced to give by the government. However, I can’t help but to believe they conveniently hide behind this logic because statistics have shown that the more money one has the less percentage they tend to give and that people simply do not donate enough. During the great depression of the 1930s, President Herbert Hoover tried a program called “volunteerism,” but it failed miserably. There simply weren’t enough Dudley Do-Rights or Mother Teresas in the world to make it work. It’s also extremely embarrassing to seek charity and could leave a needy citizen to be branded for life. Now as far as the Republicans are concerned, this humiliation helps to serve as a great disincentive to ever rely too strongly on charity as well as a lesson not to ever fall financially behind, but this pressure can too often be too much and frequently leads to domestic abuse, theft, murder, or suicide. Public aid is genuinely needed at times and the recipients are often not to blame. What would be most charitable and noble is for us to all agree now to permanently volunteer to aid those who are truly in need.

There are other important differences like how Democrats usually seem to show more concern for the health of our environment than Republicans do. For example, Democrats tend to believe global warming is a real threat primarily caused by man’s over production of carbon emissions, while Republicans tend to believe man-made global warming is just a myth or at least turn a blind eye to protect special interest groups. Republicans usually make a lot more money and are said to cater to the wealthy, upper class while ignoring the minorities. Democrats are usually not as financially well off and are said to cater to the middle class, the poor, the impaired, and the elderly. The Republican party is often viewed as racist and sexist, which of course does not include all Republicans, and the Democratic party is known to support all kinds regardless of race, age, or sexual preference. Republicans are usually more ego-driven, whereas Democrats are usually more humbled and passive. In fact, the further to the right one is, politically, the more self-centered, selfish and stingy one tends to be, like an immature child who hates to share. The further to the left of the political spectrum, the more laid-back, tolerant, and giving one usually is, even to a fault. Therefore, far right-winged Republicans are often viewed as heartless, intolerant, and uncaring and far left-winged Democrats are often viewed as gullible, naïve and overprotective. To continue the comparison, Democrats usually root for gun control, while Republicans usually fight for the right to bear arms. Republicans are usually pro-life and Democrats are usually pro-choice. The list of course goes on.

Aside from the more important distinctions, there are some more trivial but still interesting personality traits that seem to be shared by members of each party. For instance, Republicans are more likely to watch Fox News, American Idol, The Apprentice, and Survivor, whereas Democrats are more likely to watch MSNBC-News, The Simpsons, Saturday Night Live, and Star Trek. Republicans tend to prefer Jay Leno and Democrats tend to prefer Conan O’Brien. It’s not always the case, but if you live in the South or the Midwest, or love country western music, or really love to hunt, or believe the Apollo moon landings were faked, then you are very likely a Republican. Again, it’s not written in stone, but if you live up North, or live in a big city, or love New Age music, or believe in extra terrestrials, then there is a really good chance that you are a Democrat. Remember though, there are no guarantees. It’s possible to run across a Republican who can’t stand the site of blood and you can find a Democrat who loves to wear cowboy boots and lives on a farm.

But to get back to the main difference between the two parties, Republicans seek economic freedom and Democrats seek social freedom. In my opinion, both forms of freedom are good as long as they are not in the extreme. There is such a thing as too much freedom. When there is too much freedom, then people are free to unjustly take from others, free to take advantage and manipulate others for their own selfish needs, and free to behave any way they want even if it annoys others. True freedom is to be free to walk down our neighborhoods without fear of being attacked or mugged. True freedom is the freedom to have a decent job, and the freedom to learn, and the freedom to save money. Ironically, we have to have fences in order to have true freedom.

Currently, we are in an economic recession, a problem caused by both Republicans with their desire for less economic regulations and Democrats with their endless wasteful spending. So I strongly recommend to all Republicans and to all Democrats, become a moderate or a centrist. Move towards the center of the overall political spectrum. If we can all find a middle ground and a healthy balance between rules and freedoms, I believe our nation will prosper in every way. I believe mankind will finally live the way man was intended to live—in balanced comfort, with true freedom.

Added note: No political party is ever without flaw, but if you wish to know which party to support, look to the one that truly struggles for those who truly suffer. Whenever there is great corruption within any system, there are always those who benefit from that corruption, usually an elite few who gain at the expense of all others. Use multiple, reliable sources and accurate, statistical facts and figures to find the party that is being paid and/or deceived to support those who wish to preserve this unfair imbalance. They are the ones who will lie, cheat, and distort the truth in order to maintain the status quo.



13 Responses to Democrats vs Republicans

  1. This is extremely educational. I’m still not sure where I fall on the square.


    • Guyus Seralius says:

      Thanks! If you’re not sure where you fall within the Nolan chart, then you are probably somewhere towards the moderate center of all the extremes, like me, which is a good thing! At first glance, I didn’t recognize your name, but upon investigating your wordpress site and then coming across your YouTube channel and seeing your trailer video, I recognized you right away. Not long ago, I saw a podcast video of you and Poffo discussing pantheism. I see that you have a strong interest in the topic of determinism and free will. It’s one of my favorite subjects, too! Like you, I believe that all is predetermined and that all is governed by the universe; every decision, every ‘choice’, every moment. You would likely enjoy a wordpress essay I wrote and posted a while back, along with a video I made discussing my views on free will. I’ll provide you the link to that post below. Enjoy and thanks for stopping by!


  2. Mike says:

    Very interesting… thank you for writing this!


  3. Jar says:

    We spend to much time on label’s and finding the right label that fits our views.We then develop a confirmation bias because anytging contrary to the label we chose is just “wrong”..It disgust me how divided politically this country is, when in reality we’re all suppose to be on the same team.I think people need to look at issues individually and decide where they stand, instead of trying to figure out which “side” they ought to be on.


    • Guyus Seralius says:

      I think you speak many words of wisdom! To some extent, we need to label, classify, and group ourselves to help communicate ideas and to work together towards certain causes, but at the same time, I agree that we need to be careful not to allow labels or group classifications cloud our judgement or limit independent thought. We have to try to find that healthy balance in between. It’s one of the main reasons I consider myself to be a ‘centrist’ based on my political views; sometimes I like moderate Republican ideas and so I don’t trap myself in a box as you basically described. It’s always best to avoid extreme labels or to ever chisel it in stone, but rather write them gently down in soft clay (the kind that never hardens), because they are always subject to change. Putting all that aside, I share your sentiments completely that we should look at each issue individually on their own terms. Hopefully, more people will start to do the same.


      • Jar says:

        I agree labels are very necessary for proper discourse, and your essay was nicely articulated. I think this political season has been especially discouraging, hence the rant. I’m 38 and consider myself a centrist or moderate. I mention my age because maybe being in the last years of GenXers has something to do with my less ardent social political views. .I don’t think being a (centrist or moderate) is a “intellectual highground” like some people suggest..I’m just not arrogant enough to think that I unequivocally know what’s best for 350mil people.A recent study showed that moderates, independents and centrist have a better understanding of politics..So take that for what its worth…


      • Guyus Seralius says:

        I’m not surprised that such a study provided those results, because I’ve concluded long ago that the moderate and/or centrist approach is the mature, balanced approach that usually yields the best outcome. But that’s nice to know that there was actually a study that was conducted and which confirmed my long-held suspicions.

        You may already know this, but I too am from Generation X (I’m currently 43). That’s actually one of those labels I’ve always hated, because I always felt it didn’t accurately define me, personally, for I am not “directionless,” and never have been. I’ve always had a strong sense of purpose and direction. But I get that it’s a generational label and may fit many of our birth and childhood era–maybe. That’s hard to say for sure.


  4. Jar says:

    I was actually having a discussion yesterday with a 27 year old female “millennial” about how ridiculous it is to paint a whole generation of people with a broad brush..I just stumbled upon your article in passing, so, no I didn’t know anything about you until now..And I’m always interested in why people believe what they believe, and I wouldn’t mind picking your brain about your pantheist views down the road..I respect anyone who’s willing to engage openly and honesly..


  5. But then why statistically and in any study one can look up, do Republicans give more to charity than Democrats? Why is that? I find that very strange… as it doesn’t align with most opinions on what the differences are between Democrats and Republicans.

    The difference being why they give their money… for Republicans it tends to be more conditional on a moral pathway that aligns with their own, while for Democrats they tend to believe in a general equality without condition.


    • Guyus Seralius says:

      I’ve actually read opposing views on this matter from a variety of sources. It can be confusion because it depends on what one means by “charitable” and where the donations are going and whether or not the donations are in the form of money only or volunteered labor or both. One must also examine this by a percentage of what one can afford to give. For example, Republicans and/or conservatives are usually more wealthy and have far more to give (not that they necessarily worked harder to acquire it or deserve it) and Democrats and liberals work very hard for the little they have. See the irony there. Democrats and the middle class are measured to giving a higher percentage of their earnings compared to Republicans. In other words, even though Republicans may actually give more money, in certain cases, Democrats sacrifice more of what they have. A poor old woman may only give one penny, but if she only has two pennies, then she just gave up half of her savings. It should be measured that she is far more generous. Also, it has been reported in many studies that Republicans don’t give enough to those who are truly in need, those who are poor or out of work. Yes, they donate a lot, but according to statistics, mainly to their churches and other favorite charities that yield some form of return or reward to themselves, since they themselves use those services, such as giving to political campaigns, private schools their children attend, their local hospitals that aren’t truly in need of funds, and golf resorts. Republicans are also less likely to actually get out and use their time and energy to use their own hands and labor in any volunteer work. So to sum up, Democrats are more likely to sacrifice what they have, be it time, money, or labor, to help those who are truly in need like the sick and the poor. If Republicans were truly so giving, then I would think they would be happy for us to all agree to collectively give on a routine basis through a fair government aid system (which is currently far from perfect at the moment–too much wasteful spending at the federal and state level).


  6. Brenda says:

    i’m sure a pedant like me comes along every now and then – some very good points here but could i suggest a couple edits? i got really uncomfortable when i saw the descent job, please change that to decent — i was concerned when i saw bare arms; bear arms? and i don’t think there is a space in the middle of the word mankind…just some thoughts.


    • Guyus Seralius says:

      I’m just now coming across your message and edit recommendations. Thanks for bringing those typos to my attention! I’m always trying to catch those little boogers! It’s appreciated! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s